Neuroeconomists develop their own jargon, as it is to be expected from a consolidating community of scientists with distinct interests. But denominations, categorical classifications, and basic concepts in neuroeco are very much still in the early stages of their definitions – they have not been “blackboxed” yet. “Computational neuroeconomics” is one of such terms. I [...]
Archive for September, 2009
But what exactly is computational neuroeconomics?
Posted in neuroeconomics, tagged computational neuroeconomics, Dayan, game theory, Glimcher. computer models, Kali, Society for Neuroeconomics on September 30, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroeconomics – day 1
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Evanston, interviews, Society for Neuroeconomics, survey on September 26, 2009 | 1 Comment »
This is the second annual meeting of the SfN that I attend, and this time I am there to do interviews and publicize an online survey on interdisciplinarity which I designed for neuroeconomists (are you a neuroeconomist? Drop me an email at clevallois@rsm.nl, and I will send you the link to it). The program is [...]
Free-rider problem solved through neuroeconomic design
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged Antonio Rangel, CalTech, collective action, free-rider, Ian Krajbich, James Hugues, lie detector, neuroeconomics, NIM, public good, science on September 14, 2009 | 1 Comment »
That is big, really big. The free-rider problem is simple. It describes those situations when a group of individuals would benefit from a common action, but each individual separately would prefer not to make any effort to make this action happen. Like: as a group, we would like to have an environmental policy to stop [...]
